Access keys | Skip to content | Skip to footer |
Problems viewing this site

QHI Installations Pty Ltd

Summary

Incident description:

On 14 October 2009 a 25 year old worker was electrocuted while installing foil insulation in a ceiling space. A 19 year old co-worker received an electric shock and sustained burn injuries, amounting to grievous bodily harm, when she came to the aid of the electrocuted worker.

QHI Installations Pty Ltd Ltd pleaded guilty to a breach of s.27 of the Electrical Safety Act 2002.

The court found the defendant held obligations under s.30(1) of the Electrical Safety Act 2002, in particular as an employer.

The facts presented to the court revealed:

  • no trade or other technical qualification was required for the job being undertaken by the workers
  • there was no statutory requirement for power to be turned off by workers whilst installing foil insulation in ceilings
  • the defendant did not supply adequate information to workers concerning electrical risks
  • the defendant provided some general training and warnings relating to 'being careful' when installing foil insulation with staples, however, this training did not go far enough to ensure work was carried out in an electrically safe way
  • the deceased had conducted a number of ceiling insulation jobs successfully in the weeks leading up to the incident. On one other occasion he had pierced an electric cable which caused the power supply to a house to short circuit.

Court result:

The defendant pleaded guilty in the Beenleigh Industrial Magistrates Court on 4 February 2011 to breaching s.27 of the Electrical Safety Act 2002, having failed to meet its electrical safety obligations as an employer and was sentenced with no conviction recorded.

Industrial Magistrate Mr. J.M. Herlihy fined the defendant $100 000 and ordered investigation and court costs totalling $4772.55.

In reaching a decision the industrial magistrate acknowledged the defendant failed to provide adequate training to the two workers, both of whom were young and relatively inexperienced.

In deciding the penalty imposed Industrial Magistrate Herlihy took into account the defendant had not been prosecuted previously for any workplace health and safety breach, cooperated with the investigation and entered an early plea of guilty.


Considerations for prevention:

(Commentary under this heading is not part of the Court's decision.)

When working in the roofing insulation industry where there is exposure to electrical risks from live cables being penetrated, obligation holders should apply a risk management approach to ensure the work is conducted in a way that is electrically safe.

Risk management involves:

  • identifying the hazards
  • evaluating the consequences and likelihood of harm that may result from the hazard
  • deciding and implementing control measures to prevent or minimise the level of the risk from the hazard
  • monitoring the effectiveness of the control measures to ensure they remain working correctly.

When deciding on and implementing control measures associated with the risk of electrocution, obligation holders should consider isolating the supply of electricity to the area where work is to be conducted. Also, employers should provide comprehensive training to workers on conducting proper and effective risk assessments so that they are competent in recognising risks and taking appropriate steps to ensure live cables are not inadvertently penetrated whilst installing roofing insulation.

Visit the Workplace Health and Safety Queensland website for more information on:

Details
   
Industry:
Insulation services
ANZSIC code:
4253
Defendant:
QHI Installations Pty Ltd
Defendant ACN:
139 570 746
Date of offence:
14 October 2009
Location of offence:
Meadowbrook
Injury:
Fatal injuries to one worker and full thickness burns to another
Circumstance of aggravation:
1 x Fatality
1 x Grievous bodily harm
Court:
Beenleigh Industrial Magistrates Court
Magistrate:
Mr. J. M. Herlihy
Legislation:
s.27 Electrical Safety Act 2002
Plea:
Guilty
Decision date:
4 February 2011
Penalty:
Fined $100 000
Maximum fine available:
$500 000
Investigation costs:
$3948.75
Professional and legal costs:
$750.00
Court costs:
$73.80
In default period to pay:
No default period defined to pay, in default levy and distress
Conviction recorded:
No
CIS event no.:
100 786